Increased attention and partisanship on the real sector as the economic backbone of the peoples must continue to be developed, because that's the best way for our peoples. Proven and tested to survive in a crisis situation as in 1998.
There is a tendency of government macro-economic preference based on monetary and fiscal, is this due to strong capital flows from the peoples is very large capital, or is there another consideration ...?. And if this happens (monetary and fiscal sectors of priority) would be very dangerous for peoples, because it will result in social inequalities are wide between rich and poor. While we want is equality and prosperity for all of our peoples, as set out in our state the legal basis of the Constitution 1945.
Strengthening macroeconomic (monetary and fiscal) is good but it would be far better for the peoples if it is reinforced by the strengthening and development of real sectors to absorb more labors, which became the economic backbone of the peoples. Of course we still remember in 1998, when the monetary crisis hit us, and so much economic activity fell, only the real sector survive. And it is still holding our peoples to remain in a difficult situation. Are all the evidence is still not enough?.
The balance of economic management is absolutely necessary in order to run well, with sectors such as agriculture, small and medium enterprises, small and medium industries, small and medium trade, traditional markets and more will get a chance to grow and develop as people's economic backbone.
New paradigm of national development made by the elected president is a triple track strategy of pro-growth, pro-poor and pro-employment growth. I value all this as a good decision with the requirement if the policy is on the run consistently.
0 Comment(s):
Post a Comment